マスクをした女性が、学校帰りの子供に「わたし、きれい?」と訊ねてくる。「きれい」と答えると、「……これでも……?」と言いながらマスクを外す。するとその口は耳元まで大きく裂けていた、というもの。「きれいじゃない」と答えると鎌や鋏で斬り殺される、と続く。
下の絵は、江戸時代の口裂け女 ウィキペディアより
VS
辞任の時期、新党結成の時期はいつ
「辞任の時期は今日ですよ。新党結成は昨日でも今日でも準備はできている」
－－次の衆院選では新党からどのくらい候補者を立てるのか。自民と連立を組むつもりはあるのか
「いやいや、自民は過半数をとれないと思う。私は自民にいた当時、苦い思いをした人間。自民に戻らないし、戻りたくもない」
「新党の候補者については、この前、平沼（赳夫衆院議員）さんたちと一緒に塾を開き、３０－４０人を育成した。当選するかどうかは分からないけど、レベルは高かった。やっぱり日本は選挙制度が悪い。中選挙区制に戻さないといけない」
－－今回、任期を残してやめることになったが、獲得した２６０万票分の都民には、どう説明するのか
「仕方がない。もっと役に立つ仕事をするから。必ず役に立つ。都政を放り出す訳じゃあない」
－－都知事の後継候補者で、具体名は上がっているのか
「私は猪瀬（直樹副知事）さんで十分だと思っている。あんな優秀な人はいない。官僚じゃないし、同じ物書きでも私よりよっぽど優秀。言ったことは全て着手してくれた。（知事になれば）私の代わりに行動を取ってくれると思う」
－－万が一、石原知事が首相になったら形を変えての徴兵制、最低でも青年海外協力隊みたいなものを導入するのか。新党を結成したら柱の政策にするのか
「もうちょっと若い人に人間の連帯感というものを感じてほしい。自衛隊に入ってでもいいし、警察ででもいいし、無償の行為をする経験をしてもらった方がいい。実際にやるかやらないかは仲間と相談する」
－－日本国憲法は無効と話していたが、次期衆院選では公約にするのか
「（『無効』というだけでは）言葉が足りない。今の憲法のどこに合法性があるのか。（メディアも政党も）それぞれ草案を持っている。草案を持ち寄ってブラッシュアップし、それに変えればいい。占領軍の憲法が独立後も通用する事例なんて聞いたことがない」
－－無効とすると憲法に基づいて、これまで国会で成立した法律の正当性はどうするのか
「それは考えるしかない。変えるとはそういうことじゃないのか」
In the early 20th century, the British put up a sign saying "No dogs and Chinese allowed" at the entrance to a public park in Shanghai. Chinese were infuriated by the British but they were obedient to them.
However, ever since Japan suffered a major defeat in the Greater East Asia War in 1945, the British have been very successful in "buck-passing" or shifting the responsibility for degrading Chinese citizens in Shanghai and placing them on the level of "dogs" to Japan and her people, as evidenced in Bruce Lee's movie "Fist of Fury", in which Japan and her people are treated as if to say Japanese are solely responsible for the misdeed in fact practiced by the British during their dominance in China.
１９３０年代に、”犬と中国人入るべからず。”と上海の公園の入り口に看板が立てられていたという話を聞いたことがあります。これは、当時、イギリス人が立てかけていたのです。これに対して上海の中国人達は、屈辱を感じながらも、イギリス人に対して従順であった。でも、この話をいつの間にか、ブルースリーの映画で日本人の卑劣な行為として、責任転嫁されていたのを覚えている。これが、其の映画の有名な場面だ。完全なる捏造です。日本人は、怒り狂うべきところ、西洋人に諂っているのが現状です。
Read a related-story below:
軍事アナリスト 小川和久@kazuhisa_ogawa
Mr. Kazuhisa Ogawa, Japanese Military Analyst and President of Strategic Research Institute of International Change (SRIC for International Peace and Japan's Security)
tweets
"No Japanese allowed to patronize here" (written in Japanese characters) on Japanese national flag at the entrance of two "Zenshutoku" 全聚徳 resturants in Beijing, well-known for Peking Duck since 1864. "Zenshutoku" 全聚徳 has two restaurants thriving in Ginza and Shinjuku, Tokyo; therefore, Chinese government must order, without fail, its headquarters in Beijing not to allow Japanese patrons to come in. Or else, Should they write "No Chinese allowed" on Chinese flags and hoist them? They have been fully patronized by the Embassy of China, though.
日本人お断り＝北京ダック店、日の丸に記す―中国新疆（時事通信）
-北京ダック老舗「全聚徳」の2店舗。日本でも銀座と新宿で繁盛しているが、放置しないよう中国政府は北京の「全聚徳」本店に厳命すべし。それとも日本の店舗は中国国旗に「中国人は来るな」と書くか。中国大使館御用達だが。
Access "Zenshutoku" 全聚徳 website in Tokyo, Japan.
北京ダック老舗「全聚徳」サイトです。皆さん、自由にアクセスしましょう。
軍事アナリスト 小川和久@kazuhisa_ogawa
Mr. Kazuhisa Ogawa, Japanese Military Analyst and President of Strategic Research Institute of International Change (SRIC for International Peace and Japan's Security)
tweets
"No Japanese allowed to patronize here" (written in Japanese characters) on Japanese national flag at the entrance of two "Zenshutoku" 全聚徳 resturants in Beijing, well-known for Peking Duck since 1864. "Zenshutoku" 全聚徳 has two restaurants thriving in Ginza and Shinjuku, Tokyo; therefore, Chinese government must order, without fail, its headquarters in Beijing not to allow Japanese patrons to come in. Or else, Should they write "No Chinese allowed" on Chinese flags and hoist them? They have been fully patronized by the Embassy of China, though.
日本人お断り＝北京ダック店、日の丸に記す―中国新疆（時事通信） -北京ダック老舗「全聚徳」の2店舗。日本でも銀座と新宿で繁盛しているが、放置しないよう中国政府は北京の「全聚徳」本店に厳命すべし。それとも日本の店舗は中国国旗に「中国人は来るな」と書くか。中国大使館御用達だが。
Access "Zenshutoku" 全聚徳 website in Tokyo, Japan. 北京ダック老舗「全聚徳」サイトです。皆さん、自由にアクセスしましょう。
ナニを喰ってもその国の食文化なので文句を言うつもりはありませんが、ワンコだけは許しません！( ｰ`дｰ´)ｷﾘｯ RT @okgogo4 犬を食べてしまう朝鮮人。気持ちが悪すぎる
Une fille coréenne en train de préparer le dîner
via twitter.com
Un commentaire japonaise:Je ne dire rien sur ce qu'ils mangent car c'est leur culture alimentaire. Mais je ne peux pas accepter toute personne mangeant "toutous" en toutes circonstances. C'est tellement dégoûtant!
ナニを喰ってもその国の食文化なので文句を言うつもりはありませんが、ワンコだけは許しません！( ｰ`дｰ´)ｷﾘｯ RT @okgogo4 犬を食べてしまう朝鮮人。気持ちが悪すぎる
A Korean girl preparing dinner
via twitter.com
The Japanese comment above says, I do not say anything about what they eat since it is their food culture. But I just can't accept them eating "doggies" in any circumstances. It's so disgusting!
I'm beginning to gradually develop a clearer picture of why Australia has been a hard-line proponent of the anti-whaling cause in the Southern Hemisphere, compared with other anti-whaling nations. Its firm and un-compromising position helps us portray a picture of the nation desperately reminding the world of the Australian claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica rather than being deeply intertwined with the demonstration of its persistent antagonism against Japan's whaling activities.
According to the Australian government, it claims that its Antarctic territory covers nearly 5.9 million square kilometers, about 42% of Antarctica and nearly 80% of the total area of Australia itself.
The Conference on Antarctica held in Washington, D.C. on October 15, 1959 produced "the Antarctic Treaty" agreed and signed on December 1, the same year by the following 12 nations; The Governments of Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, the French Republic, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the Union of South Africa, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America.
What Article IV of the present Treaty stipulates is interpreted as and surmarized into "freezing of any claims to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica as long as the Treaty is in force.
It is easily assumed that Australia strongly objects Japan's whaling activities in Antarctic ocean not only for reminding the world of its territorial claim and but also possibly for reinforcing it by stretching its tentacles with the use of a terrorist group, Sea Shepherd, and even with the help of the governments of the United States, New Zealand, and Netherlands. Among them, Australia and New Zealand are claimants and the United States of America reserves its right to make a claim in the original Antarctic Treaty while Japan is a non-claimant.
Whenever Sea Shepherd refers to the Antarctic Ocean, it uses an expression "the Australian Antarctic waters" as if to say that the Antarctic Ocean has been recognized as the Australian territorial waters. Or even Sea Shepherd insists that the Government of Australia dispatch navy ships to stop the Japan's whaling activities. Besides, Sea Shepherd has already declared to execute "Suicidal Kamikaze Attack" on the Japanese whaling fleet consistently pursing lawful and peaceful whaling activities in the Antarctic Ocean.
Considering the fact that a cohort of terrorists "Sea Shepherd" has been fully protected by the Government of Australia, their statements seem to be probably threatening to the parties of the Antarctica Treaty and particularly to Japan, thereby misleading us to think that the Government of Australia has violated Article I of the Treaty, stipulating"Antarctica shall be used for peaceful purposes only. There shall be prohibited, inter alia, any measures of a military nature, such as the establishment of military bases and fortifications, the carrying out of military maneuvers, as well as the testing of any type of weapons."
The Government of Australia and Sea Shepherd should keep it in mind that the Treaty did not parse out the competing sovereignty claims, however, it established a system of joint-governance by the Treaty parties, including Japan.
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
豪州が何故南氷洋における捕鯨反対を？Why Australia promotes anti-whaling movements?
ILLEGAL HARASSMENT AND TERRORISM AGAINST ICR RESEARCH 日本の調査捕鯨に対する違法ハラスメントとテロ行為 （和文もあります）
Planet of Apes Series Depict Hatred toward the Asian People (Yellow Race) 映画猿の惑星は、アジア人に対する蔑視だった
maggieRspapaBrad George @
maggieRspapaBrad George
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @ TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
maggieRspapaBrad George @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
maggieRspapaBrad George @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
maggieRspapaBrad George
According to Wikipedia written in Japanese, La Planète des singes in France, Planet of the Apes in U.S.A., Monkey Planet in U.K., and 猿の惑星 in Japan is said to be a story written based on its author Pierre Boulle's actual experience in French Indochina during the Greater East Asia War.
Before the outbreak of the war, Pierre Boulle was engaged in enslaving and exploiting the Asian people in French Indochina. However, he was captured by Imperial Japanese Forces and was sent to a camp where he thought he was thrown into a position of the Asian people he used to exploit.
Therefore, apes described in the movies are the Asian people. The movies depict his own interpretation (biased against the Asian people) of how he was treated by Japanese soldiers at POW camp. They are nothing but a mere expression of hatred toward the Asian people, particularly Japan and her people who stood up for the emancipation of the Asian people.
映画猿の惑星とは、何を意味しているのか。
フランス人プランテーション経営者であるブールが仏領インドシナにて現地の有色人種を使役していたところ、同じ有色人種である日本人の率いる軍の捕虜となった「立場の逆転」の経験を基に描かれたとされる ーウィキペヂィア
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YPv6Tpf40Q&feature=player_embedded
Recent Comments