GHQ憲法は、日本永久占領政策@beatWGIP
1941.10.3 野村駐米大使「このまま対日経済戦を行いつつ武力戦を差し控えるに於いては、米国は戦わずして対日戦争目的を達成するものである」
上記ツィートの箇所を実際の野村駐米大使の回顧録から以下の通り写真にて共有します。
この本は、昭和２１年７月１０日に発刊されたもので、物資が欠乏していた時代でもあり、藁半紙を使い印刷されております。東京神田の古本屋街を散歩していて見つけた本です。
今の儘對日經濟戦を行ひつゝ武力戦を差控へるに於ては、米國は戦はずして對日戦争目的を達成するものである。世界政局に大いなる變化ある場合及び日本が政策を變更する場合の外は、其の對日外交方針は不變なりと考へる。－－－－
Today I visited US Navy Yokosuka base and participated in 19th annual CFAY Spring Festival. Below you will find some of the photos taken today to give you an idea of the annual event. It is a regret that we have no cherry blossom blooming in the Kanto area yet due to the weather colder than usual or the winter started late. See [Updated] Cherry Blossom (Sakura) Blooming Forecast 2012
It was a beautiful day today although it was a bit cold. This annual event has been well known among the locals for sometime. So, what usually happens is a huge crowd and mile-long lines of visitors waiting to enter the US naval base. By the time I reached the security post, I felt so exhausted and hungry.
After I was thoroughly checked, I ran for vendor booths but what I found again was long lines of people waiting to buy foods and drinks. I spent at least one hour to enter the base and 30 minutes to buy my smoked Turkey leg, Officers Club Burger, and a drink.
Click photos to enlarge them. (Pop-up windows)
米国反捕鯨団体を支援するツィッター上の実質の指導者である@ego_Iamと称する者が日本の天皇陛下の御真影を無断で使用し、日本を誹謗中傷しております。
Dear Mr. John V. Roos, U.S. Ambassador to Japan;
This brief message I am sending to you is prepared specifically to inform you that I have come across the following tweets whose profile photo is His Majesty the Emperor of Japan Akihito and whose account name is @Ego_Iam who has been insulting and defaming Japan and her people for some time under the name of protecting whales and dolphins.
Ted
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
Just Like "Flying Tiger" a U.S. covert operation, his presence is dubious: Whaling protest's helo pilot denied Aussie visa: http://bit.ly/rATPvn
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
In the months after the tsunami-induced meltdowns at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station this spring, anti-nuclear sentiment swept Japan, which relied on atomic energy for about 30 percent of its electricity before the accident. Although devastated by their country's losses, Mizuho Fukushima and Yuichi Kaido were less surprised by the disaster. Fukushima, the lawmaker who leads Japan's Social Democratic Party, and her partner, Kaido, a public-interest lawyer, have spent three decades resisting Japan's nuclear rise in their respective arenas: parliament and court. But the cozy nuclear plant operators and government officials who make up Japan's so-called "nuclear village" largely ignored their efforts -- that is, until this year.
The Fukushima Daiichi disaster has now forced the island country to re-examine the safety of its nuclear facilities. Naoto Kan, Japan's prime minister until he resigned in August, called in July for Japan to wind down its nuclear program, and his successor, Yoshihiko Noda, agrees. Kan also requested the closure and upgrade of a power plant in the earthquake-prone coastal city of Hamaoka, a facility whose safety Kaido had called into question nearly a decade earlier. Had he won the Hamaoka case, Kaido said, this year's disaster "could have been prevented." Today, Fukushima and Kaido see a changed political horizon. As Fukushima told the New York Times in August, "Although I won't be able to change the past, I think I can change the future."
FUKUSHIMA
Muse Natalie Portman.
Stimulus or austerity? Stimulus.
America or China? Both.
Arab Spring or Arab Winter? Arab Spring.
Reading list A Suitable Amount of Crime, by Nils Christie; The Shock Doctrine, by Naomi Klein; The Lie of Nuclear Power, by Hiroaki Koid
Best idea The decision of Naoto Kan, now ex-prime minister of Japan, to stop operating the Hamaoka nuclear power plant.
Worst idea News of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant's melting down.
KAIDO
Muse Jessica Alba, especially in Dark Angel.
Stimulus or austerity? Stimulus.
America or China? Impossible selection.
Arab Spring or Arab Winter? Arab Spring.
Reading list The Lie of Nuclear Power, by Hiroaki Koide; The Shock Doctrine, by Naomi Klein; Ultimate Punishment, by Scott Turow.
Best idea Gradual abolition of nuclear power and weapons; rapid introduction of green energy.
Worst idea The war on terror makes the world more unsafe and hostile.
@minorucchuジャーナリスト 田中稔
@TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama @
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
TedYokohamaTed Yokohama
mizuhofukushima福島みずほ
mizuhofukushima福島みずほ
mizuhofukushima福島みずほ
mizuhofukushima福島みずほ
mizuhofukushima福島みずほ
In relation to political donations of USD 811,688 (calculated at the rate of JPY 77 against USD) made to a group branched from "Citizens Party" by former Prime Minister Kan through his political fund management organization named "Soushi Kai", literally meaning Grass Ambition, it is learned on September 5 that Special Task Force Unit of Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office has accepted a bill of indictment filed by residents of Kanagawa Prefecture. Special Task Force Unit will begin its investigation to examine possibility of pursuing criminal charges. Thus, his political donations may develop into a criminal case.
A bill of indictment states that Kan's political fund management organization "Soushi Kai" has made political donations of USD 649,350 (calculated at the rate of JPY77 against USD) in 8 installments in 2007 to a political party "The Party To Take Over The Governmet of Japan", a group branched from "Citizens Party". The accounting book kept by Kan's fund organization shows negative balance of payments from May 8 that year. Besides, the book shows no record of borrowing money from any sources.
The bill further states that Kan has failed to record incomes which he should have; therefore, he has violated Political Funds Control Law since he clearly stated "In my own judgment." in reply to a question raised over his political donations if they were made based on his judgement.
According to the Sankei Newspaper, the Democratic Party of Japan has made political donations of USD 2,017,272 (calculated at the rate of JPY 77 against USD) to a political party "The Party To Take Over The Governmet of Japan", a group branched from "Citizens Party".
Kan has been accused of violating Political Funds Control Law over acceptance of political donations made by a Korean citizen living in Japan.
菅前首相を捜査へ…地検が告発状受理 市民の党側献金で規正法違反罪
Read related stories:
Law flawed but Noda should return donations: Fujimura
Political Donation by Foreigners: "I didn't know my donor was a foreigner." is not a excuse
@SatoMasahisa佐藤正久
@ponta2629ぽん太
To begin with, one comment made by a South Korean and two replies to the comment will be introduced before focusing on a subject of how South Koreans reacted to the visit by three Japanese lawmakers and also on their reactions that might have violated the South Korean penal code in a number of ways.
A South Korean comment and two replies to the comment:
tim690213 said in Korean: 자꾸 독도문제로 지랄거리면 우리대한민국이 중국,대만,러시아,북한과 연합하여 일본본토를 침략공격하여 완전 박살,파괴시킬것이다!
koitsuwayurusen said in English and in Japanese: I translate your comment into Japanese. あなたのコメントを日本語に訳しておきます。
＜以下、tim690213氏のコメントの日本語訳＞日本が独島問題でいつも妄言を吐くようなら、われわれ大韓民国は、中国・台湾・ロシア・北朝鮮と手を組んで、日本の本土に対し攻撃を加え、日本人を全滅させ日本を崩壊させるだろう。
Below is a translation of the Korean tweet into English which remains provisional since it only sounds megalomaniac.
As long as Japanese express delusions over Takeshima issue, we will have to get united with China, Taiwan, Russia, and North Korea for attacking and annihilating the Japanese race, thereby destroying Japan.
koitsuwayurusen said : ＜私の感想 My comment＞韓国には良い精神病院がないのですね。お気の毒さま。I am sorry to know that there is no good hospital for mad men in ROK.
South Korean reactions to three Japanese lawmakers' visit:
Before clicking a YouTube video to watch, please keep it in your mind that you may find behaviors of South Korean protesters quite disturbing and deranged to the free and civilized countries.
-6 min. 0.3 sec.-
Reporter said: I am reporting from a terminal of Gimpo airport in Seoul. I understand that demonstrations are usually prohibited within airport terminals. However, as you can see, banners are all over. Many members of civil activist groups are gathering to protest against three Japanese lawmakers' visit.
Korean activists said: "Apologize and return back to Japan!"
Newscaster said: Some activists are placing black tapes on photos of three lawmakers and then set fire on the banner. I really wonder what they are trying to do. And, they are messing up terminal floor with curry power. They have prepared three caskets. Two girls are trying to kick a guy probably acting like "Sumo wrestler". All of these performances show their violent feelings of refusal for three Japanese lawmakers to enter South Korea.
Mr. Shindo Yoshitaka said: The case that instead of securing our free passage and safety in South Korea, we representing Japanese nationals are refused to enter South Korea will develop into a major diplomatic issue.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Mr. Yukio Edano said: We just can't accept such a measure taken against our lawmakers legally trying to enter South Korea.
Newscaster said: Their visit to Ulleung Island was announced on July 15. Three lawmakers are members of a special committee on territories established within the Liberal Democratic Party whose purpose is to carry out research on Takeshima issue. Ulleung Island is situated about 90 kilometers west of Takeshima islets. On Ulleung Island South Korea has a museum displaying articles related to their territorial claim over Takeshima islets. Three lawmakers were scheduled to visit the museum on the island. South Korea have incorporated Takeshima islets into Ulleung municipality. The government of South Korea had earlier informed the Government of Japan that three lawmakers would be refused to enter South Korea. Lee Jaeoh, Specially Appointed Minister is visiting Takeshima islets today as if to show his intention to restrain three Japanese lawmakers to visit Ulleung Island.
Mr Shindo Yosihtaka said: If we don't go there, we would look like giving in to their threat.
Newscaster said: Three lawmakers are Mr. Shindo Yoshitaka, a member of the House of Representatives, Mr. Sato Masahisa, a member of the House of Councilors, and Ms.Inada Tomomi, a member of the House of Representatives. They are all members of the Liberal Democratic Party. They calmly explained their purpose of visit to the press.
Mr. Shindo Yoshitaka said: Our purpose of visit is not to wave our national flag and not to engage in any activities related to Japan's territorial claim over Takeshima islets. We just go there. That's all.
Mr. Sato Masahisa said: We are not trying to stage any uprising there but we really want to see their basis for territorial claim and its historical background.
Ms. Inada Tomomi said: We intend to promote a true friendship with South Korea by objectively observing their claim. So, I really hope that they will let us in.
Reporter said: South Korean activists are trying to break into arrival area.
Newscaster said: This is a kind of treatment they would have received if they entered South Korea.
South Korean activists said: Three Japanese lawmakers will be burnt to death under the name of South Koreans.
One activist said: They are totally wrong even to think of visiting our territory. If we go to Shimane Prefecture, claiming that Shimane is ours, will you let us come in?
Japanese tourist said: I have been so shocked to see what's happening there. I'm a little bit worried.
Newscaster said: Immigration Control Act (Republic of Korea) has an article stipulating that persons deemed likely to commit any act detrimental to national interests of the Republic of Korea or public safety. It seems that South Korea has applied this article to the case of three Japanese lawmakers. South Korean YTN news reported in the afternoon that Japanese lawmakers have been refused to enter South Korea since they claim Japan's territorial sovereignty over Takeshima islets. The case that Japanese lawmakers were refused to enter South Korea has been considered as a very unusual situation.
Some South Koreans might have violated the South Korean penal code:
Remarks on South Korean Penal Code
Chiefly based on Japan's Penal Code, law theories, cases, etc., South Korean Penal Code was prepared and enacted in 1953 as other basic laws were enacted based on Japanese laws. (Wikipedia)
Chapter 4 (Provisional translation done by Ted Yokohama)
Article 107 No.1. stipulates that those who commit either assault or intimidation against a head of foreign state staying in Republic of Korea shall be sentenced to imprisonment not exceeding more that 7 years either with or without forced labor.
No.2 stipulates that those who either insult or defame a head of foreign state staying in Republic of Korea shall be sentenced to imprisonment not exceeding more than 5 years either with or without forced labor
Article 108 No.1 stipulates that those who commit either assault or intimidation against foreign mission shall be sentenced to imprisonment not exceeding more that 5 years either with or without forced labor.
No.2 stipulates that those who either insult or defame foreign mission shall be sentenced to imprisonment not exceeding more than 3 years either with or without forced labor.
Article 109 stipulates that those who damage or remove or dishonor either national flag of foreign state or national emblem of foreign state shall be sentenced to imprisonment not exceeding 2 years either with or without forced labor or will be fined not exceeding 3 million won.
Article 110 stipulates that the crime prescribed under the preceding articles 107,108, and 109 shall not be prosecuted against the express will of a foreign government.
The Republic of Korea Might Have Violated Immigration Control Act:
What is a definition of "Terrorists" in South Korea? This question is asked because the government of South Korea treated three Japanese lawmakers as if to say they are terrorists and because the government of South Korea has not responded to this question raised by three lawmakers yet.
Article 11 (Prohibition, etc. of Entry)
(1)The Minister of Justice may prohit the entry of a foreigner who falls under any of the following sub-paragraphs:
3. Persons deemed likely to commit any act detrimental to national interests of the Republic of Korea or public safety.
A Failure to Secure Free Passage and Safety of Three Japanese Lawmakers
Mr. Shindo Yoshitaka said: The case that instead of securing our free passage and safety in South Korea, we representing Japanese nationals are refused to enter South Korea will develop into a major diplomatic issue.
The statement made by South Korean pres. Lee "We don't guarantee safety of three lawmakers if they visit South Korea. " suggests nothing but a threat to three Japanese lawmakers. Mr. Lee should have exerted every possible effort to secure free passage and safety of three Japanese lawmakers instead of instigating his people to act against Japan and her people.
Diplomatic Reciprocity
While South Korea discusses "social responsibility" with UN Chief placing a greater emphasis on involvement of intellectuals and academics, South Korea has neglected a basic rule in the international community. That is, to observe an internationally recognized rule of reciprocity.
Japan welcomed a mission consisting of South Korean parliamentarians, intellectuals, academics, etc. to visit Takeshima museum in Shimane Prefecture on February 22. However, South Korea flatly and outrageously rejected three Japanese lawmakers to enter South Korea for the purpose of visiting Ulleung Island where South Korea has a museum displaying articles related to its territorial claim over Takeshima islets. This is not only a total denial of reciprocity but also a violation of Article 11-1-3 of South Korean Immigration Control Law.
Therefore, South Korean government must be accountable for the occurrence of the unprecedented incident between Japan and South Korea still said to be maintaining the closest relations in many respects. Access VOJ via Tweeting at Outrageous Refusal of Three Japanese Lawmakers to Enter South Korea
刑法 (大韓民国) 韓国WEB六法 刑法２（各論） 第108条（外国使節に対する暴行等 第109条（外国の国旗、国章の冒涜） Immigration Control Act (Republic of Korea)
It is crystal clear that four northern islands and Takeshima islets have been integral part of Japan. However, four northern territories and Takeshima have been illegally occupied. U.S.A. loves to regard Takeshima issue and four northern territories issue as territorial disputes although Japan sees nothing disputable as they have been historically integral part of Japan.
U.S.A. has been much concerned over Libya's future and U.S.-China relations right now. Only limited number of Americans are aware of Japan's territorial issues. Only few Americans have recognized the fact that South Koreans attacked and occupied Takeshima on Jan. 18, 1952 (Read Takeshima Day竹島の日Should Be Remembered Along With January 18, 1952-A Date Which Will Live In Infamy ) while U.S. news media report on Japan-S. Korea issues, always beginning with emphasis on Japan's brutal colonial occupation of Korea which in fact has been fabricated by U.S.A. , thereby encouraging South Korea to act against Japan.
@YonhapNews: Marines of S. Korea, U.S. holding joint anti-terrorism exercise http://bit.ly/rsMf0H -end of tweet- My question: What is your definition of "Terrorists" in South Korea? This question is asked because the government of South Korea treated three Japanese lawmakers as if to say they are terrorists and because I believe that the government of South Korea has not responded to this question raised by three lawmakers yet. Access Voice of Japan via Tweeting Daily at Outrageous Refusal of Three Japanese Lawmakers to Enter South Korea And, one more question. Since when South Korea has become colonized by U.S.A.? One of your nationals calls Japanese people "Japs". Is this the way your people call Japanese in your country?
@shinjihi: "北朝鮮がいま、真に狙っているのは、キリスト教徒の善意の献金よりもはるかに大きな金額を出し得る日本である。..." tweets Ms.Yoshiko Sakurai (a journalist) states "North Korean real target is much larger than any donations to be made by Christians; that is, a huge amount of money North Korea considers possible to extort from Japan. In 1990 when Shin Kanamaru made a visit to North Korea and also in 2002 when ex-Prime Minister Koizumi visited there, North Korea approached Japan with an ulterior motive to extort trillions of Yen from Japan. Now North Korea is trying to exploit Prime Minister Kan whose major concern is to survive a harsh move to pull him down, for its mere purpose of extorting money from Japan. Prime Minister Kan has been treacherous to Japan and her people.
@SatoMasahisa: 韓国の団体が、対馬で8月15日に声明発表「日本、私たちの土地、対馬を返せ」「「過ぎた日の誤りを反省せず歴史を歪曲」と日本政府を糾弾。韓国政府は佐藤等国会議員が韓国領の鬱陵島を視察するだけで入国禁止措置を行った。韓国政府はこの団体の動きをどう総括するのか？まさかよくやったとの評価？ tweets A group of Koreans visited Tsushima Island (it has been a part of Japan for centuries. Nobody has ever questioned it. ) on August 15 where it made a declaration condemning Japan by shouting "Japan should return our land Tsushima Island back to us!" and "You have distorted a history without reviewing your wrongdoings!" while the government of South Korea outrageously and illegally refused three Japanese lawmakers including me to enter South Korea, trying to visit Ulleung Island. I really wonder how the government of South Korea will explain the move made by the group to us? No way the government of South Korea praises it highly? I hope not. -end of tweet- Access Voice of Japan via Tweeting "Outrageous Refusal of Three Japanese Lawmakers to Enter South Korea" at http://bit.ly/nG0ZrU
@SatoMasahisa: 韓国李大統領、光復節の演説で「日本は未来の世代に正しい歴史を教える責任がある」と指摘。竹島問題に触れなかったことは日本への配慮と思われるが、一般的に外国が日本の教育や取り分け教科書の内容に言及・介入するのは普通じゃない。気づいているのだろうか？日本だからは理由にならないtweets South Korean pres. Lee stated in his speech on Liberation Day(? or Separation Day I am responsible for this addition.) that Japan should teach its future generations a correct history. Although that he did not refer to Takeshima issue may be his diplomatic gesture shown to Japan, I really wonder if president Lee has ever noticed that his frequent reference to and/or interference with Japan's education, namely what Japanese textbooks should contain is not normal. "Just because Japan" does not constitute any ground for his interference with Japan's internal affairs.
Searchina reports that South Korea's recent moves to protest against Japan over its territorial claim reflects a political motive; that is, to pacify its people frustrated over internal affairs in South Korea as the presidential election will be held in 2012. It further says that whatever South Korea does in an attempt to substantiate its claim over Takeshima will end in vain because only 1.5 % of the nations and areas in the world recognize Takeshima as a territory of South Korea. http://bit.ly/q0WkrQ
RT @shindo_y: 日本側が中止を申し入れていた、本日予定の韓国ハンナラ党代表による竹島上陸は、天候不良により中止となりました。明日は韓国民主党代表が上陸を予定しており、引き続き監視が必要です。#takeshima #JNSC #kawaguchi>@shindo_y tweets The scheduled visit to Takeshima islets by a representative of grand national party (Hannara) ,which Japan requested the government of south korea to cancel has been canceled due to bad weather. We continue to stay alert for the scheduled visit to Takeshima islets by a representative of korea democratic party.
RT @SatoMasahisa: 外交は内政の延長線上にある場合も。自民党議員の韓国訪問の際に、デモ隊の抗議プラカードの多くは韓国語、更に韓国の公権力が金浦空港管理施設内での過激行為を黙認、大統領の側近の李特任長官がツイッターで世論を煽り、軍服を着ての竹島や鬱陵島での演説。それらが全てを物語っているとの見方も。tweets The case of "Foreign affairs is an extension of internal affairs":When trying to visit South Korea, I observed that many of placards protesters were carrying with them were written in Korean and that the South Korean authority had given tacit approval of violent protests staged against our visist within the premises of Gimpo airport administration facility. South Korea's Lee Jae (oh), one of the presidential aides, had stirred up anti-Japan sentiment when he appeared in military uniform on Ulleung Island. The above reveals the whole thing.
@YonhapNews: S. Korean political leaders to visit Takeshima in show of support http://bit.ly/pp0CBi -end of tweet- My comment: Instead of playing around and wasting time, it is wise to behave like a grown-up in an international community and face "international justice" at the international court of justice, Hague. Access Voice of Japan via Tweeting Daily at US Ambassador Van Fleet Clearly States in His Report "Takeshima Belongs to Japan"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YPv6Tpf40Q&feature=player_embedded
Ego_Iam@Ego_Iam
Ego_Iam@Ego_Iam
Recent Comments